Pagan Journey

All things pagan, Wiccan, and New Age: A place for the shamans and wise women

You are here

21 Lessons of Merlyn: Stupidest Druid Book Ever

Replies

Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous on

I read parts of this book, and I too found it disturbling, and sometimes hilarious in that "does anyone really believe this nonsense?"  As a neo-pagan myself, I have often had to use my own common sense when and understanding of history to wade through some of the things I have read to discern what my true beliefs are.  Just because something is written, does not make it true.  Just becasue something spiritual is written and claims to be true, does not mean it should be blindly followed.  There is too much of that in mainstream religion, I hope it will not bleed over into alternative religion.

 

Deborah Blake's picture

Holy crap. Or unholy crap, maybe. I found this post to be both depressing and hysterically funny. As a Llewellyn author, I am saddened every time a book of this sort comes out, since it makes all the rest of us look bad. On the other hand, it is a pretty funny assortment of nonsense. I always try to doublecheck my facts, since I know folks are going to be reading my books and believing what I say. (Which isn't to say I always get it right, but at least I don't confuse Celtic and Roman deities. Oy.) I think it is important for all pagans/neopagans/witches/whatevers to think for themselves. Books are intended as an aid to thought, not a substitute. And informed discusssion is the hallmark of a thriving religious community.

 

Deborah Blake Author of The Goddess is in the Details (Llewellyn 2009), Everyday Witch A to Z (Llewellyn 2008), Circle, Coven & Grove (2007)

lisala's picture
Submitted by lisala on

Hi Deborah

There are good books from Llewellyn, as you know, but there are an awful lot that are well . . . let's say that they suffer from insufficient editing and fact-checking. I note that I've suggested non Pagans as well as Pagans take a look at The Pagan Family by Ceisiwr Serith.

I do wish that more Pagan authors were in touch with traditional scholars; we could benefit, enormously, from the contact, especially in terms of things like practical experience with ritual. Certainly there are a large number of academics who would be willing to help with resources and such.

Thanks much for taking the time to comment; it is much appreciated.

m 's picture
Submitted by m on

ive read this one and the lost books of merlyn- and honestly- i found them ricidulous . if your looking for a book to make you laugh and not really learn anything- then these are for you, but if you are actually trying to learn anything factual- keep looking.

lisala's picture
Submitted by lisala on

 . . . but none are by Monroe.  What puzzles me is that there are good sources, including primary sources, regarding ancient druids and Celtic religius practices, but they seem to be ignored. I'm noticing an increase in bald and false assertions, things like there were no women druids (yes there were), that Bards were the second highest in the druidic caste (no they weren't; they were the lowest tier), and that the druids were vegetarian (if that includes eating meat, then yes!).

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.