21 Lessons of Merlyn: Stupidest Druid Book Ever

3 Comments: Join In!

The 21 Lessons of Merlyn: A Study in Druid Magic and Lore - Douglas Monroe (Llewellyn Publications, 1992).

This has got to be one of the stupidest Neo Pagan books ever; it's hands down the stupidest ostensibly 21 lessons21 lessonsCeltic or Druidic text ever. First, some background: the book purports to be a re-telling of the lore from a "lost" druidic 16th century manuscript entitled The Book of Pheryllt. In 21 Lessons, Merlyn ostensibly imparts this knowledge to a young Arthur. It's a load of well, crap. Seriously, there's almost nothing actually true in this book with respect to Celtic myths, languages, or druids.

According to Monroe's Introduction, the druids made books of leaves, with each leaf representing a character of ogham. Ogham is a late fifth century creation, one that's very definitely based on Roman writing and letters. Most of his information about ogham, by the way, is based on Robert Graves book, The White Goddess, a book Graves later essentially disowned, and one that's full of errors.

Monroe states that druids were vegetarian (p. 42). This is absolutely not true; for one thing, the climate they lived in was not one that was conducive to vegetarians; they would have starved. For another, the laws about precedence at the shared cauldron specifically discuss fork-rights, and meat, for druids and poets. For a third, two of the few druidic rituals we have specifically require that the druids eat meat during the ritual.

According to Monroe, Easter is the Gaelic festival of the Goddess Ishtar. This is so idiotic I hardly know where to begin. Easter is derived from the same root as "East," rather obviously. Middle English ester, Old English astre, derived from the Proto Indo-European root *aus-, to shine. There's no connection, at all, with Ishtar, who is a deity of the Sumero-Babylonian region, and is of Afro-Asiatic, and not even possibly related to a Celtic deity. In fact, he keeps getting references to Celtic deities wrong; for instance, he thinks the Roman god of doors, Janus, is Celtic.

Then there's the rampant misogyny. Monroe clearly has certain issues around women and sexuality (and by the way, the pictures of the young blond boy scattered throughout, and Monroe's references to children are seriously creepy). According to Monroe's chapter on male and female druids (chapter 12), male druids were required to be celibate. Given the numbers of druids who had children in the myths, the genealogies, and the law codes, and the rules about inheritance, this is absolutely false. He describes female druids having sex in order to take power from men, since they have none of their own. This is far more deeply revelatory regarding Monroe's own issues than anything approaching accuracy regarding druids. It's particularly odd given that in the Celtic myths in Irish and Welsh, the power of sovereignty is conferred by a woman upon a man.

Monroe has a bizarre mixture of modern Neo Pagan bits, fake Irish and Welsh from movies, and dangerous herbal lore—he suggests drinking absinthe, without going into the details about which absinthe is and is not safe, he suggests ingesting mistletoe berries, and, rather hilariously, has pumpkins growing in the Celtic regions of Europe as a native, medieval plant.

According to Monroe, this tome of druid wisdom is from the sixteenth century Welsh manuscript called the Book of Pheryllt. This is untrue. The manuscript is a forgery, and Monroe, who can't even read Modern Welsh, certainly couldn't read a sixteenth century copy of an early Middle or Old Welsh text. Still not convinced? I'm a Celticist, rather than a Neo Pagan, but here's Ellen Evert Hopman,

Run away from this book. It's full of stupidity.

Comments

I read parts of this book,

I read parts of this book, and I too found it disturbling, and sometimes hilarious in that "does anyone really believe this nonsense?"  As a neo-pagan myself, I have often had to use my own common sense when and understanding of history to wade through some of the things I have read to discern what my true beliefs are.  Just because something is written, does not make it true.  Just becasue something spiritual is written and claims to be true, does not mean it should be blindly followed.  There is too much of that in mainstream religion, I hope it will not bleed over into alternative religion.


 

Worst Druid book ever

Holy crap. Or unholy crap, maybe. I found this post to be both depressing and hysterically funny. As a Llewellyn author, I am saddened every time a book of this sort comes out, since it makes all the rest of us look bad. On the other hand, it is a pretty funny assortment of nonsense. I always try to doublecheck my facts, since I know folks are going to be reading my books and believing what I say. (Which isn't to say I always get it right, but at least I don't confuse Celtic and Roman deities. Oy.) I think it is important for all pagans/neopagans/witches/whatevers to think for themselves. Books are intended as an aid to thought, not a substitute. And informed discusssion is the hallmark of a thriving religious community.


 


Deborah Blake Author of The Goddess is in the Details (Llewellyn 2009), Everyday Witch A to Z (Llewellyn 2008), Circle, Coven & Grove (2007)

Llewellyn

Hi Deborah

There are good books from Llewellyn, as you know, but there are an awful lot that are well . . . let's say that they suffer from insufficient editing and fact-checking. I note that I've suggested non Pagans as well as Pagans take a look at The Pagan Family by Ceisiwr Serith.

I do wish that more Pagan authors were in touch with traditional scholars; we could benefit, enormously, from the contact, especially in terms of things like practical experience with ritual. Certainly there are a large number of academics who would be willing to help with resources and such.

Thanks much for taking the time to comment; it is much appreciated.